Reading science fiction tales allows people with poor grip in English to improve their grammar skills. Speaking and writing in broken English is the end result of not knowing how the structure of the English sentence work. Through regular reading, you will learn the appropriate way to write a proper English sentence. There are sci-fi tales at different reading problem levels. You can begin in the one with simple reading difficulty level which has shorter length and then gradually advance to reading stories with tougher reading difficulty that have longer duration.
As you read the science fiction story, you will encounter words that you don’t understand. Every time you locate a challenging term, you should look up the dictionary and find out its meaning. If you did not buy a dictionary, you can use the online dictionary to look up the meaning of the phrase. You can learn how to announce the new word properly by playing the sound to your pronunciation in the online dictionary. The more science fiction tales you read, the more wide your vocabulary will become.
Well, that depends on the kind of story you’re writing. The length of your tale will dictate the quantity of character information you will have to make them come to life. For simplicity sake, I’ve broken my personality sheet to what I use for each kind of writing. Your character sheets may vary.
Fiction by its very definition is unreal. When we read a novel we are aware that the story and the characters in it are only a product of creativity of the writer. When we see a movie we know that the characters are only acting their parts essentially pretending to be somebody besides themselves. Still we are mentally affected by the turns and twists in the story. We laugh with them, weep with them, and even feel indignant towards the bad men. The lovable hero or heroine may be despicable in real life and the protagonist may be a perfect gentleman, but we identify them with the characters they’re portraying. In essence for that short period we ourselves get hauled into the imaginary world of the writer. Strangely enough this happens too with the author at least to a number of them. He or she goes through the same emotions while writing and perhaps later also. Now that you have read through this far, has that stirred your opinions in any way? You may already have guessed that best site is a large field with much to find out. You can find there is much in common with topical areas closely resembling this one.
You never really know about any one aspect because there are a lot of varied situations. Do you know exactly the kind of info that will help? If not, then you should discover more about this. The rest of our talk will add to what we have mentioned so far.
“Knowledge is limited, imagination is not.” Albert Einstein explained that even though the wording of the second part might have been different. Einstein like any other human being was not infallible. Some of his views he held right until the end turned out to be wrong within the subject of physics. In this particular announcement also he appears to have it backwards. Knowledge may be restricted in the case of someone but generally it is unlimited even when we believe just rational knowledge leaving aside transcendental. Science in particular has shown this at every step in the course of its own development. Imagination pertains to a single mind and can be constrained by numerous things depending on the situation of the person. A mind can envision only what happens in a way to matters already stored in it. A person that has been outdoors a distant location in jungle and has had no contact with the world outside cannot imagine what metropolitan cities would be like.
Getting back to fiction that the creativity of the writer also has to be predicated on his direct or indirect encounters. In this sense fiction is based on reality and to this extent it represents another dimension of reality. Here of course we run to the philosophical problem of the precise significance of reality. You will find two diametrically opposite viewpoints – materialistic and spiritualistic. According to the prior only things that can be perceived through our senses are real, everything else is unreal. The latter asserts that there’s one ultimate reality from which all that we perceive comes out and what that is perceived is only an illusion. We consider a statement by Einstein: “Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one.” He was obviously referring to the fact of this phenomenal world. The word illusion can have different connotations but in general it means perceiving something as different from what it really is. Therefore the existence of the thing is a prerequisite for illusion, it isn’t a mental construction. Imagination is a mental phenomenon and has nothing to do with anything really existent. Thus the relationship between fiction and reality is entirely different from that between illusion and reality. It does take some time to write a complete story for any kind of book.
In a philosophical sense that the incredible world itself may be regarded as fiction. That is what Shakespeare possibly meant when he wrote: “All the world’s a stage, and all women and men merely players”. We might also consider everything in the world (space, time, matter) as players because everything has its own entrance and exit. We naturally run into the issue of saying what the point is and who wrote the script. Shakespeare probably believed in God, strict determinism, also in the truth of earth, so he didn’t have this issue. Now it’s usually thought that the world also has a beginning and will have an ending. If the universe is also a player, are there multiple universes or does it come alone on the stage and then presents other players? However, what is the point in this case? Quantum physics points to a single possibility. At extremely tiny scales of space and time there’s a quantum emptiness that’s not really empty but full of energy which is constantly transforming itself into virtual particles as well as back. What remains after the end of the universe may be an infinite variation of this quantum void full of energy into which each of the thing has converted itself. This universal energy is the source of and background for all.
It isn’t merely a philosophical point either. We invest a substantial part of our life from the imagined or fictional world. We muse about the items in future and dwell over the past imagining what could have been. The creativity about the future is dependent on our hopes and ambitions and to some extent it’s a positive in the sense we’re in a position to mould our future when we sincerely try. But musing over the past is a futile exercise since we know for a fact that ‘what could have been’ is only fantasy that never happened. Still it serves the exact same purpose as fiction in the point of view of entertainment. We amuse ourselves by imagining how life would have been, knowing fully well that it has no reality whatsoever. In a metaphorical sense past, at the distant past, is fiction. At a certain sense history itself is fiction since it always includes the subjective bias of the author. What we understand of Buddha and Jesus now is much more fiction than truth.